1. Prince Harry lets his enemies at Buckingham Palace off the ABC sex scandal hook
When Prince Harry appeared on Netflix recently, he complained about a whispering campaign directed against him and his wife, Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, by a cabal of racist officials at Buckingham Palace. He asserted that the cabal turned the press against the couple.
Bizarrely, Prince Harry could have made life hell for his alleged tormentors at the Palace by merely mentioning their role in the ABC child sex scandal. It involves the cover-up of a transatlantic paedophile network that abused children for during the period before, and including, 2015-18.
Prince Harry’s bestselling memoirs ‘Spare’ proved to be little more than reheated Netflix soup. There was no mention of the ABC scandal in it.
2. Prince Harry’s book promotion tour for ‘Spare’: the ABC scandal is off limits.
Prince Harry did not grant open interviews to the media for ‘Spare’, as is the norm for an author promoting a book. Instead, he permitted a few select journalists to ask him deferential questions he had vetted in advance.
The handpicked reporters did ask him about the one scandal looming over Buckingham Palace that has the potential to inflict serious damage on the masters of the dark arts whom Prince Harry professes to despise. They are members of the same cabal he believes drove him and his wife into exile.
The members of the cabal – PR officials at the Palace – were responsible for the cover-up of Prince Andrew’s role in the Jeffrey Epstein-Ghislaine Maxwell sex trafficking scandal.
Prince Andrew, the Duke of York, was supplied with a 17-year-old-girl, Virginia Roberts (Giuffre) by Epstein and Maxwell. She was commanded to have sex with the duke three times, once in London.
ABC TV in the US discovered details of the scandal from Virginia Roberts in 2015. In response, the cabal’s enforcers at the Palace threatened to blackball the station. ABC was warned that Prince William and his wife would shun them if they ran an interview they had recorded with Roberts.
A video of Amy Robach, the ABC reporter who conducted the interview with Roberts, can be accessed via the video in the tweet below. In it, she describes the threats made by the Palace to ABC:
3. Enabling further child abuse, 2015-2018.
The scandal went into an abeyance until 2018. During the period 2015 to 2018, Epstein and his associates continued to rape and abuse underage girls. He and Ghislaine Maxwell would still be jetting to Epstein’s island were it not for Julia Brown, the intrepid Florida-based reporter who eventually managed to expose the scandal. She was certainly not afforded an interview by Prince Harry.
4. Only Prince Andrew, the Duke of York, is to shoulder blame for the additional three year existence of Epstein’s transatlantic paedophile ring.
The British media has ignored the ABC chapter of the sordid Epstein saga.
So-called ‘anonymous’ sources have deflected media attention from the ABC entanglement. Instead, they have focused the spotlight of blame on the arrogance of the Duke for the prolonged rape of minors.
The cabal at the Palace does not want to be seen to knife Prince Andrew in the front as it continues with its campaign to distance itself from the cover-up of Jeffrey Epstein’s rape of minors during 2015-18. Instead, it has been busy stabbing the duke in the back. The onslaught has helped to distract the public from the existence of the ABC scandal.
The Daily Mail is the cabal’s weapon of choice in the portrayal of the Duke as the sole culprit. The Mail has quoted what it describes as ‘anonymous’ sources who ‘revealed’ earlier this year that:
“Speaking on condition of anonymity, a senior former royal adviser stressed that while there was no knowledge of the extent of the duke’s friendship with Epstein and Maxwell to anyone outside of the prince’s private office, the ‘Andrew problem’ was a long-running issue for the royal household in general.
‘Anyone who even dared to offer their professional advice that maybe his way wasn’t the right one was met with a decisive ‘f*** off out of my office’,’ the source said”.
The account is backed up by other former royal staff, all of whom claim the prince acted as if he “didn’t have to answer to anyone” and was allowed to “go rogue”.
Particularly troublesome, it was said, was Andrew’s role as a roving trade ‘ambassador’, which saw him repeatedly criticised for cosying up to highly controversial world leaders and businessmen.
A former Buckingham Palace staff member recalled how it was an “impossible job” to persuade the prince or his advisers to take any instruction. “The duke made clear that the only person he answered to was the Queen”, they said.
“He wouldn’t take advice from anyone. [He] acted with total impunity and staff were just too scared to stand up to him as a member of the Royal Family. Her Majesty almost always backed him and he fully exploited that.
There’s an element of Buckingham Palace sleepwalking into his whole crisis. Andrew would tell his family that it was all untrue and it would all go away”.
It would stretch credulity beyond breaking point to suggest that all these sources emerged at the same time with an identical agenda by sheer coincidence.
5. Palace officials leak without fear or consequence.
It would be easy for King Charles III to identify the Mail’s sources as there is no more than a tiny pool of people who have retired from the Palace in the recent past with this type of knowledge.
The Mail’s sources displayed little or no fear of repercussion when they breached their duty of silence to the Palace.
There has been no inquiry at the Palace.
Clearly, this was part of a structured and approved PR offensive.
After he became king, Charles III continued to distance himself from his brother Andrew.
The real mystery is why Prince Harry has not seized upon the ABC scandal to destroy his enemies.
6. Questions for Prince Harry.
A number of questions arise for Prince Harry.
- Did he – Prince Harry – know about the cease and desist threats made by the Royal family to ABC? If so, when did he learn of them?
- Was he asked to participate in a boycot of ABC? If so, what was his response?
- Does he know the names of the Palace officials who made the threats to ABC?
- Whether he knows the officials by name or not, is he prepared to condemn them?
- Does he believe it is possible that a threat to curtail the activities of Prince William and the Duchess of Cambridge could have been made without the knowledge of Prince William and his spouse?
- Is Prince Harry aware of how Prince William reacted to the threat to ABC in 2015 or at anytime subsequent thereto?
- Is Prince Harry aware if his brother ever complained about the fact he and his wife were being exploited to protect a paedophile ring?
- Children and teenagers were exploited raped, abused for a further three years after the ABC investigation was shut down? Does he agree that this is a scandal for which the Palace must shoulder some blame?
- Why has he never once made any reference to the ABC scandal?
7. Mountbatten is off limits too.
Lord Louis Mountbatten, who is also related to Prince Harry, has been accused of abusing boys and teenage males, some of them in the Republic of Ireland.
A number of questions for Prince Harry arise on this front too:
- Has Prince Harry any knowledge of how the Palace reacted to the revelations about Mountbatten?
- Does he believe that the Royal Archives should be released in so far as they relate to Mountbatten’s abuse of minors?
See the link in the next paragraph for further details about Mountbatten’s abuse of minors. Click anywhere on the paragraph:
